Monday, October 18, 2010

BCS for Dummies


I know the into may sound familiar, but keep reading.

The BCS-it is three harmless consonants that, when put together, become the most feared acronym in the college football universe. It is a combination of computer code, a calculus exam, and a beauty pageant. Teams are thrown into a mixture of logarithms and equations while having to please voters in multiple polls by 'looking their best' every week. The BCS has her favorites, and they are from the so-called BCS conferences. Still, the BCS likes to flirt with those outside her normal boundaries.

Let's take a look at the top ten teams in the BCS poll:

1.Oklahoma
2.Oregon
3.Boise State
4.Auburn
5.TCU
6.LSU
7.Michigan State
8.Alabama
9.Utah
10.Ohio State

So, why does this poll differ so much from the AP Top 25 or the USA Today Top 25?

NOTE: THIS IS THE BORING DEFINITION

First of all, the BCS rankings have three factors that determine a team's positioning. The Harris Poll (which replaces the AP Poll), The Coaches Poll, and the Computer Rankings all have one-thirds say in each team's ranking.

Through the Harris and Coaches, or USA Today, polls teams are ranked by the voting members from 1-25. Inversely, teams that are ranked 25th get one point, 24th gets two points, and so on. In the end, the team's scheduled points are divided by the overall possible points they could have received which is 2,580 points in the Harris Poll and 1,475 points in the Coaches Poll. Therefore, if a team is voted number one by all voters in the Harris Poll, there tally would be 2,580/2,580 which equals 1.000.

The computer ranking is trickier because it adds multiple aspects. Strength of schedule, quality of wins, and win/loss goes into calculating six categories of rankings. Say a team has a ranking of 1,2,2,2,2,5 in the respective categories. The computer rankings drops the highest and lowest rankings (1,5) and averages the rest to rank the team as the 2nd best in the nation. To determine the ranking, just divide 24 (the points the team would have received) by 25 (the maximum possibility of alotted points).

Now enter in the simple equation (Harris+Coaches+Computer/3). If the team was number one in the Harris and Coaches with all of the number one votes and number two in the computer rankings, the team would have an average of .987.

NOTE: THIS IS THE REAL DEFINITION

If you happen to still be reading after that definition, let me put a more accepted spin on the BCS.

The BCS is a woman. Do not let anyone tell you otherwise. It is a woman who is looking for love. She may not be the most committed woman, as she needs a new flame each year, but, nevertheless, she has her own needs. She has the class of the Bachelorette with the re-run capability of Tila Tequila, and the fight for her love has never been more dramatic.

The BCS places more value on 'her' conferences. The six conferences (ACC, Big 10, Big 12, Big East, Pac-10, SEC) are automatically admitted to her treasured 'galas'...or bowls. They are the stronger, more attractive teams that have to endure many trials and obstacles to obtain her love. The endurance and passion that they show for her sake entice her to value them more.

Then, there are the Cinderellas (Boise St., TCU, Utah). They are those nice, charming guys who are subject to the BCS's flirtation and have high hopes year-after-year to only be diminished into the friend zone. They are those guys that all of her friends like, but do not hold the value and prestige as the older, socially acceptable guys. As much as these Cinderellas feel cheated and betrayed, make no mistake. The BCS is hurting from their hurt and is close to a transition.

She is now caught between history, temptation, and reputation. The love affair with the SEC is becoming steady. The 'friend' is turning into the flame. Countless other upstanding 'men' are proving that they deserve her love in the Big 10, Big 12, and Pac-10. Will the love affair continue? Will she become committed to one man (Alabama) for longer than a year? Will the sweet, charming friend overcome the strong, attractive men? Or, will this just be Armageddon?

There are many questions to be answered, but one thing is for certain. It is sure to make great television.

No comments:

Post a Comment