Sore subject for Alabama fans, but I find it relevant to this year's situation.
"Out of their element, out of their league-and still perfect."-Associated Press describing Utah after the 2009 Sugar Bowl
In their element and league but just shy of perfect, the Alabama Crimson Tide went into the 2009 Sugar Bowl as heavy favorites. Jaded from their 31-20 loss to a hated Florida Gators team and a hated Tim Tebow, many expected the Tide to roll into New Orleans and roll over the smaller, slower, and undermanned BCS-buster Utah. As the game panned out, the reverse took place. A pathetically apathetic Tide team gave up twenty one points in the first eleven minutes. Despite Nick Saban's best efforts and a hell of a punt return from Javier Arenas, Goliath was only able to pull within four before ultimately losing 31-17.
After exceeding expectations in Nick Saban's second year, this was embarrassing. Check off a perfect regular season, a stout defense that allowed around eleven points a game, and playmakers such as a powerful, young receiver in Julio Jones, the veteran running back, Glen Coffee, and freshman phenom Mark Ingram. What did Utah have? Ask anyone outside of the Mountain West, and they probably could not tell you. Apparently, they had a defense, a quarterback, and more heart than Alabama could imagine. They sacked John Parker Wilson eight times. Brian Johnson threw for 336 yards and three touchdowns. Ultimately, the mentality of the 'fight in the dog' overcame the size of the SEC dog in the fight.
Speaking of mentality, a new one emerged on that night. It was not the one of BCS-busters having championship say. Earlier Utah and Boise State teams had proven that. The mindset was one more of discredit from the 'other' side. As I am sure Oklahoma feels towards Boise State, Alabama fans discredited the Utah team. Excuses protruded from every Bama faithful tongue. The Tide were not motivated to play in a Sugar Bowl when they could have been at the National Championship, especially against lowly Utah. No matter, fact is fact. Utah outperformed the Tide in every aspect of the game, including soul. At the end of the day, they were the only undefeated team in the nation and were never in a position to even make the National Championship game.
However, Boise State is now in that position. The mindset is more prevalent than ever. Top-ranked BCS conference teams and fans believe they could trounce the Broncos if given the chance, but they are hesitant of that chance. The stakes are higher. If you lose, talk will continue for years to come. If you win, so what? You were supposed to dominate as Georgia did against Hawaii. Had Hawaii won, Georgia still would not be able to live down the fact. Alabama has not been able to live down the fact. While one side discredits the fact, the other side revels in the fact and always resort to it. Honestly, Alabama discredits Boise State, but, at the same time, Broncos faithful always resort to the Utah game in argument. Considering this is a much improved Alabama team and Boise State is better than the typical 'SEC' mindset, are we both in the wrong?
'The Utah Effect' is real. It can be seen on a daily basis through general conversation, chat rooms and discussion boards, and ESPN segments. We, as college football citizens, have bred this mindset. By season's end, there will either be revelry in 'upset' or jubilance through shutting down this BCS-buster revolt.